Adjudica source release 2026.08.24 · runtime and legal approval not implied
Skip to main content
Applicant Attorneys: Contingency Model

Move Repetitive Case Work Into an Attorney-Reviewed Workflow.

Adjudica can assist with record review, proposed form values, research, and drafting. Your firm validates the source record, makes the legal decisions, and determines whether the work product is fit for use.

Source-linked

Assistance where the workflow provides citations

Review required

Counsel verifies proposed facts and analysis

No outcome promise

Results depend on the matter and firm workflow

Copilot

Professional judgment remains with the attorney

Workflow Assistance

Focus Attorney Time on Review and Strategy

Configured assistance can support repetitive tasks, but actual time savings, capacity, and case outcomes depend on the firm, record quality, enabled features, and attorney workflow.

Medical record reviewVerify record
Manual reviewProposed summary
QME/AME report analysisVerify report
Manual analysisProposed issues
Forms and correspondenceVerify fields
Manual entryProposed values
Settlement demand prepVerify content
Blank-page draftReviewable draft
Legal researchVerify authority
Manual searchCandidate sources
Strategic evaluationNever delegated
Attorney judgmentAttorney judgment

Planning Inputs

Model Your Own Firm, Not a Promised Outcome

Current case volume
Firm-supplied input
Fee or billing assumptions
Firm-supplied input
Expected workflow change
Illustrative only
Adjudica subscription
Use current pricing
Projected result
Not guaranteed

Use the ROI calculator only for user-input, illustrative scenarios. Adjudica does not promise savings, additional matters, revenue, settlement value, or a break-even date.

Commercial evaluation

Firm-specific

Compare the source-observed subscription price with your own validated workload, staffing, fee, and adoption assumptions. Results are illustrative, not promised.

The Quality Argument

Review Quality Matters More Than Automation Claims.

Adjudica can organize source material and propose issues for review. It cannot guarantee completeness, precision, settlement value, or any other legal or commercial outcome.

Better Med-Legal Discussions

The workflow can propose inconsistencies, rating issues, and apportionment questions from processed QME/AME materials. Source links may be provided; counsel must review the complete report and verify each issue.

WPI Identification & Verification

Adjudica can assist counsel in comparing reported WPI findings with configured research materials and calculation inputs. It does not determine the correct rating or case value; licensed materials and attorney verification remain required.

Apportionment Challenge Arguments

Search configured apportionment materials and develop proposed counter-arguments for attorney review. The workflow may miss relevant authority or facts and does not predict benefit or settlement outcomes.

Demand Letter Drafting

Generate a proposed settlement-demand draft with available source links and legal references. Counsel must verify the record, citations, calculations, legal position, and final language.

PD Calculator: All Three PDRS Schedules

Free Tool

Source configuration includes Permanent Disability Rating System calculations for selected schedules and comparison aids. Rule, input, WPI, schedule, and result coverage require professional verification; no settlement or valuation outcome is guaranteed. Confirm any licensed source access for the customer environment.

MSC Prep in Minutes

Prepare proposed MSC timelines, summaries, arguments, and settlement-support material from processed case data. Citation availability and completeness vary; attorney review is required.

Built From the Inside

Built by a CA WC Attorney, for CA WC Attorneys

Alex Brewsaugh has practiced CA WC law for 15 years on both sides of the bar, defense and applicant. This dual-side experience is unusual. Most WC attorneys spend their careers on one side.

Adjudica was informed by recurring document, research, and drafting work in CA WC practice. Its configured workflows are intended to support those tasks while keeping attorney review and professional judgment in control.

This is not a technology company that interviewed attorneys about their pain points. It is a law practice that built technology around it.

Ready to Evaluate an Attorney-Reviewed Workflow?